Onchain mandates with institutional-grade integrity.
Declarative execution constraints. Atomic enforcement. Full audit trails.
IntentGuard closes the Execution Gap for regulated funds, treasury mandates, and structured strategies moving onchain. Compatible with Fireblocks, Fordefi, Ledger Enterprise, and Safe.
Three failure modes the Execution Gap creates for institutional capital.
Strategy intent diverges from onchain execution
Each leg of a multi-step rebalance can clear within nominal slippage tolerance while cumulative execution cost crosses the mandate ceiling. Per-transaction checks do not catch aggregate drift. Reconciliation finds it after settlement.
Gaps between approval and execution
Multi-sig coordination windows, key rotation events, and the handoff between trader, treasury, and signing infrastructure leave intervals where transactions can be intercepted, replayed, or front-run before they are mined.
Post-trade reconciliation depends on offchain logs
Without immutable, per-transaction outcome records, audit trails rest on internal logs that auditors and regulators have no independent way to verify. Outcome enforcement creates a chain-attested record at the moment of settlement.
ACID-style guarantees on top of the custody and signing infrastructure already in place.
IntentGuard is an enforcement layer, not a custody replacement. The signing flow, policy engine, and counterparty relationships stay where they are.
Custody layer
Fireblocks · Fordefi · Ledger Enterprise · SafeAuthorize transactions through the existing custody stack and policy engine. IntentGuard does not hold keys, mandate signers, or replace approval workflows.
Submission layer
IntentGuard RPCSubmit signed transactions through the IntentGuard RPC instead of a generic provider. Transactions are held privately, never propagated to the public mempool, until matched with a Protection Transaction.
Constraint layer
Protection TransactionDeclare the outcome the transaction must satisfy: net balance changes, recipient set, cumulative cost ceilings, expected inflows and outflows. Sign from the same authorized signer set as the original transaction.
Settlement layer
Onchain enforcement contractExecution is validated against the declared constraints atomically. Either the mandated outcome lands or nothing settles — no partial execution, no consumed nonce, no wasted gas.
Cross-protocol rebalance, mandate ceiling 250 bps.
- Each leg passes its 30 bps slippage check independently.
- Cumulative execution cost across legs reaches 480 bps.
- Trade settles. Mandate ceiling breached.
- Reconciliation surfaces the breach in the next NAV cycle, not at settlement.
- The Protection Transaction declares the 250 bps ceiling at signing.
- Execution is validated against the declared cumulative outcome.
- If aggregate cost would breach 250 bps, neither transaction is included.
- Mandate compliance is enforced at the chain level. Audit trail is the chain itself.
Two paths into IntentGuard.
Per-transaction outcome enforcement through the public IntentGuard RPC. Same enforcement primitive used by every IntentGuard user. Suitable for early-stage strategies and exploratory mandates.
Read the user guide →Dedicated SLAs, custody-stack integration support, custom constraint templates, white-glove onboarding, compliance-aligned reporting, and audit-ready documentation. For regulated funds, structured products, and treasury mandates.
Talk to our institutional team →Same enforcement primitive, different audiences.
Onchain vault curation? Cascade losses and depositor-visible execution drift enforced at the chain level.
DAO, foundation, or project ops? Plain-language protection for payroll, grants, and multisig transfers.
Autonomous execution layer? Signed-intent enforcement for MCP and delegation frameworks.
Bring mandate-grade enforcement to your onchain execution.
We work with regulated funds, treasury operators, and structured-product teams to integrate IntentGuard into existing custody and signing infrastructure.