Your vault leaks value on every rebalance.
Every rebalance is an execution gap. Wide slippage bounds hide that gap from you. Bots exploit it anyway. IntentGuard enforces tight bounds and routes privately so you capture the spread, not the bots.
That loss has a fix — and a sequenced rollout. Start by enforcing your own operational transactions: fee distribution, internal swaps, team treasury. Scale to customer-facing rebalancing once your team has confidence in the constraint surface.
What you don't measure, bots extract.
Execution drift compounds across every rebalance. Wide tolerances that hide the gap get exploited anyway.
The math that kills your margin.
Without enforcement
- ✗You set 5% slippage to handle drift
- ✗MEV and sandwich attacks push drift to 3%
- ✗You still have 2% unused tolerance
- ✗Bots see that 2% and take it
- ✗Your margin disappears every trade
With IntentGuard
- ✓You set 0.3% max slippage
- ✓IntentGuard enforces it onchain
- ✓Outcome breaches tolerance
- ✓Transaction reverts. Zero gas.
- ✓Bots can't exploit you anymore
Four steps. No workflow changes.
Route through us
Point your vault contract to the IntentGuard RPC.
Set tolerance once
Define max slippage, acceptable price range, balance thresholds.
Set retry window
Choose how many blocks we retry if execution drifts.
Settle or revert
Tight bounds enforced onchain. Out of bounds, transaction drops.
Where IntentGuard sits.
"Verify, do not trust." — DeFi Security Summit 2025
Same enforcement primitive, different audiences.
DAO, foundation, or project ops? Plain-language protection for payroll, grants, and multisig transfers.
Mandate-driven capital? Institutional integration with Fireblocks, Fordefi, Ledger Enterprise, and Safe.
Shipping autonomous execution? Signed-intent enforcement that prompt injection cannot bypass.
See your execution gap.
Free 90-day analysis. We'll show you exactly how much MEV and drift you're leaking on every rebalance.